What do you think of Jaime Diaz stories?

[Hector]

The ones that present Goofy as historical personalities (A Goofy Midas, Don't Call Me Tut etc). I think they're masterpieces, but, for some reason, they got plenty
of bad reviews.

[Scrooge MacDuck]

I also think they're absolutely awesome. This was incidentally also the opinion of French publisher Hachette, who published "A Very Goofy Frankenstein" as a hardcover.

[RobbK1]

I liked them, and think they are very funny. The artwork is okay. I don't like it as much as Gottfredson's, Gonzales', Wright's, Scarpa's or even Moores' Goofy. But, the stories are decent-looking enough, funny and entertaining.

[Hector]

Has anyone else realized Goofy Frankenstein has a sexual joke? When Goofy tells Mickey they'll create life together and Mickey
misunderstands those words and freaks out.

[Scrooge MacDuck]

Sure. It surprised me a little that it slipped past the censors, and also strengthened the feeling that these Jaime Diaz stories are the predecessors of Don Rosa in many ways.

[Hector]

Don Rosa did that when he wrote his last story, so he no longer had anything to lose.

[jumbojr]

Not a fan of these stories, I've read some of them once(Tut, Beethoven, Frankenstein) and never read them again. I didn't think they were funny.

[Hector]

I've only read 3 (Midas, Tut, Frankenstein) and, today, i read somewhere there are 20 of them. Darn, i wish i could read the rest as well.
Why don't they publish them in a collection, like Carl Barkses library?