I just received Giorgio Cavazzano book today, and just flipping through the pages, this book is a beauty to behold. Cavazzano's artwork is really a treat for the eyes. This looks like a good one! I also have the next Paul Murry volume coming soon, and I ordered the Al Hubbard/Dick Kinney volume tonight as well. Admittedly, I have a lot less to say about Murry's work, other than it is consistent and at best, enjoyable. The upcoming Paul Murry Phantom Blot book looks like it will be noteworthy mostly for the unusualness of the premise and stories, offering a break from Carl Falberg's tried and true formula for the Mickey serials.
I guess his storytelling became a bit mellower and less extreme. But I think 1) the plot is really interesting 2) Goofy shines very strongly and 3) I happen to love the inking by Sandro Del Conte. To me this period of Scarpa is among the most beautiful Mickeys I've ever seen.
Ahhh. I guess we differ in our viewpoint of Sandro Del Conte then (and that era of Scarpa). I much prefer Scarpa's art inked by Rodolfo Cimino and Giorgio Cavazzano, in the 60s and 70s. The art just feels more energetic and alive to me in those earlier decades. Case in point: In 1984, Scarpa did an epilogue to his 1972 epic "Pippo e i parastinchi di Olympia", which I honestly think is pretty insignificant and disappointing compared to the original. The pocketbook edition I read printed the sequel right after the original story (naturally enough), and you could really feel the difference in both storytelling and art. It didn't help that Scarpa added Trudy to proceedings either. The 1972 story had a much stronger narrative focusing on the triangle of Mickey, Goofy and Pete.
I've seen that quoted before as an example of Scarpa's art being worse in the 80s compared to the 70s. I honestly don't remember much from the story, so I'll have to dig it out again.
But the standalone MM stories from the era are, IMO, very strong. And some of the Cavazzano-inked stuff from the 60s especially just seems too "edgy" for my taste. Case in point : The first two Zenobia stories were printed in a German book that also contains a mid-60s Goofy story by Scarpa, and I think apart from Ubezio, that is actually the least appealing art in the book (which also contains stories by De Vita, later Cavazzano and Perina). Mickey's nose really looks odd in some panels.
Ahhh. I guess we differ in our viewpoint of Sandro Del Conte then (and that era of Scarpa). I much prefer Scarpa's art inked by Rodolfo Cimino and Giorgio Cavazzano, in the 60s and 70s. The art just feels more energetic and alive to me in those earlier decades. Case in point: In 1984, Scarpa did an epilogue to his 1972 epic "Pippo e i parastinchi di Olympia", which I honestly think is pretty insignificant and disappointing compared to the original. The pocketbook edition I read printed the sequel right after the original story (naturally enough), and you could really feel the difference in both storytelling and art. It didn't help that Scarpa added Trudy to proceedings either. The 1972 story had a much stronger narrative focusing on the triangle of Mickey, Goofy and Pete.
I've seen that quoted before as an example of Scarpa's art being worse in the 80s compared to the 70s. I honestly don't remember much from the story, so I'll have to dig it out again.
But the standalone MM stories from the era are, IMO, very strong. And some of the Cavazzano-inked stuff from the 60s especially just seems too "edgy" for my taste. Case in point : The first two Zenobia stories were printed in a German book that also contains a mid-60s Goofy story by Scarpa, and I think apart from Ubezio, that is actually the least appealing art in the book (which also contains stories by De Vita, later Cavazzano and Perina). Mickey's nose really looks odd in some panels.
Interesting... which mid-60s story was that? My favorite period art-wise of everything I've seen by Scarpa is probably the late 50s to early 60s, which was also the original golden age of his long Mickey epics. While I like the late-60s art, it's perhaps not quite as fantastic as that earlier period. I do love the art in 1972's "Pippo e i parastinchi di Olympia", though, which I'm pretty sure is inked by Cavazzano.
I've seen that quoted before as an example of Scarpa's art being worse in the 80s compared to the 70s. I honestly don't remember much from the story, so I'll have to dig it out again.
But the standalone MM stories from the era are, IMO, very strong. And some of the Cavazzano-inked stuff from the 60s especially just seems too "edgy" for my taste. Case in point : The first two Zenobia stories were printed in a German book that also contains a mid-60s Goofy story by Scarpa, and I think apart from Ubezio, that is actually the least appealing art in the book (which also contains stories by De Vita, later Cavazzano and Perina). Mickey's nose really looks odd in some panels.
Interesting... which mid-60s story was that? My favorite period art-wise of everything I've seen by Scarpa is probably the late 50s to early 60s, which was also the original golden age of his long Mickey epics. While I like the late-60s art, it's perhaps not quite as fantastic as that earlier period. I do love the art in 1972's "Pippo e i parastinchi di Olympia", though, which I'm pretty sure is inked by Cavazzano.
Interesting... which mid-60s story was that? My favorite period art-wise of everything I've seen by Scarpa is probably the late 50s to early 60s, which was also the original golden age of his long Mickey epics. While I like the late-60s art, it's perhaps not quite as fantastic as that earlier period. I do love the art in 1972's "Pippo e i parastinchi di Olympia", though, which I'm pretty sure is inked by Cavazzano.
Hmmm... I have read it, but don't remember much of it.
Which is oddly appropriate given the story's title and content - which consists of Goofy constantly forgetting something. Not too interesting, really. Perhaps somewhat in line with some Bill Walsh stuff.
One last update: The shipping date changed, and my copy of Volume 14 arrived today!
Also, does anyone know if there have been or will be any stories featuring Gideon McDuck in these volumes? Also, does anyone know if the Van Horn volume will feature any major Rumpus McFowl stories?
I have no idea why, but ducks just tend to be the most compelling characters.
Donald, Scrooge, Darkwing, Howard, Daffy, Duckman... the list keeps growing!
Just curious... is anyone planning on inducksing the latest volumes? Vol. 14 recently came out, but Inducks is only up to Vol. 11. Would be great to have them all up there.
Post by mickeyanddonaldfan on Dec 23, 2020 8:40:24 GMT
Asking a question about the upcoming William Van Horn volume: Will there be any stories featuring Rumpus McFowl or Woimly Filcher? Also, I'd love a Casty volume.
(By the way, a question to the site administrators: I tried finding the post I link to above by searching this thread for 'Casty', but it simply doesn't turn up. Instead, I had to find it manually. What's up with the search engine?)