Post by Scrooge MacDuck on Aug 1, 2017 18:32:19 GMT
Barks's notorious one-shot villain Chisel McSue, of The Horseradish Story, is popularly known to have first been picked up in 1980 in Canute the Brute's Battle Axe. However, reading through old American non-Barks comics, I came across this, in the 1964 story The Whatzit Bird:
The story, at that point, already explained that a shady fellow, whom Donald was sure was a crook, sold Scrooge a map to an island where these big ol' golden eggs can be found. This man is that crook. And if it's not Chisel, then, by Jove, it's got to be his long-lost twin brother. Look at him.
So what do you think? Is this a conscious re-use of a Barks character? (Not as improbable as it sounds, with how we unearthed a Western story featuring Rockerduck, with no apparent Italian influence.) Did Strobl just lift a Barks design with no continuity intended? Is it just an astounding coincidence? To the credit of influence one way or another from Horseradish Story, note raft shenanigans occur later on.
we unearthed a Western story featuring Rockerduck, with no apparent Italian influence
Rockerduck appears in 3 W-coded stories (as much as Glomgold, ironically). The first one is obviously Barks' Boat Busters (WDC #255, December 1961), the second one is Poolside Party by ?/Wright (Uncle Scrooge #93, June 1971), and the third and last one, the one we "unearthed", is Scrooge for a Day by Evanier/Wright (Beagle Boys #23, January 1975).
Maybe it wasn't intended to be exactly him, it could be that Strobl just re-used a "villain" design created years before by Barks for a totally unrelated character, but from the looks alone, that is most certainly Chisel McSue.
(Sorry for the up, I'm just browsing around past threads)
It looks more like that Strobl was assigned a villain for this story, and then used a design he remembered from Barks’ story, but he didn’t remember who it belonged to. Of course, this is only a guess from my side, but it seems somewhat logical.
It looks more like that Strobl was assigned a villain for this story, and then used a design he remembered from Barks’ story, but he didn’t remember who it belonged to. Of course, this is only a guess from my side, but it seems somewhat logical.
I think that this is likely what happened. Why waste a conniving, expert lawyer on something any ordinary villain ("bad guy") can and would do? IF the author wanted the reader to understand that this character was "Chisel McSue, and MUST be him, because he was needed especially for this story, he or she would have that information written in the story's narrative, or leaked out in its dialogue.