You can often find a large group of stories that undoubtfully take place in the same universe, but the looks of the ducks greatly vary among them. For instance, Barkses and Rosa's stories. They're established as part of the same canonicity, yet Rosa's ducks look nothing like Barkses. Hell, even Barkses ducks change their looks, depending on what era the stories are from, yet there are references that can place them in the same timeline (for instance, in Glomgold's second appearance, the ducks are visibly taller than they were in Glomgold's first story, yet the second story shows the nephews making a reference to the first story). The obvious out of universe explanation is that each artist has his own style and, even when it comes to the same artist, the style can change over the course of his career. But, what i'm looking for in this thread is an in universe explanation. I recall something one said in a discussion at the adult section. That there is a comic filter that shows things as the artist wants the reader to see them, not as they really are (that was an answer to why the ducks do not wear pants). So, if we go by that ''filter theory'', during all Barkses/Rosa's stories, the ducks have the same looks all the time, they just look different to us because of the filter. And, finally, how do you want to imagine, in your headcanon, the unfiltered ducks? Personally, i think they always looked like their mid 50s version (Barks), which portrays them well balanced between human and duck features.
Post by Scrooge MacDuck on Nov 14, 2017 20:25:00 GMT
I run with the "the comics are loose in-universe biographies" idea so often seen in Italian stories, which I know some American comics (such as some Super Goof stories) also flirted with. Don Rosa is a more "detailed" artist and so I assume that his ducks are as close to what the character "really" look like as one can get with two-dimensional linework.