Múmia is a cousin of Mim, mentioned in B 860220. She lived in 2000 BCE. I don't know if múmia is supposed to be a name, or if the cousin is just a mummy.
In D 9074, Scrooge mentions his great-grandfather (unnamed). He is mentioned in the French and Dutch versions, so probably not a translation error.
Donald’s uncle Otmar should be removed. We had him with D 3776 as a reference as he was supposedly mentioned in the German translation of this story. However, Otmar is not mentioned in the German translation of D 3776, but in the German translation of I TL 921-A. The original Italian version thereof does however not mention any relative.
Múmia is a cousin of Mim, mentioned in B 860220. She lived in 2000 BCE. I don't know if múmia is supposed to be a name, or if the cousin is just a mummy.
In D 9074, Scrooge mentions his great-grandfather (unnamed). He is mentioned in the French and Dutch versions, so probably not a translation error.
Donald’s uncle Otmar should be removed. We had him with D 3776 as a reference as he was supposedly mentioned in the German translation of this story. However, Otmar is not mentioned in the German translation of D 3776, but in the German translation of I TL 921-A. The original Italian version thereof does however not mention any relative.
Very interesting regarding Otmar - Gilles Maurice marked him as having been in D 3776. D 3776 was only published once in German that's been recorded - and it never appeared with I TL 921-A. My guess is that it might have originated from a typo - D 3776 appeared in Micky Maus 1977-22, while I TL 921-A appeared in Micky Maus 1977-02. Given the difficulty I had with the German forum and the mistakes I made in interpreting the posts there, I could see something similar having happened in this case
As it stands, the scans don't load for me - the link just leads back to this post.
As for D 9074, I'd say it's up to you how you want to handle it We currently have all of Scrooge's great-grandfather slots filled. Honestly, my stance would typically be to ignore these kinds of mentions - it's one thing if it's filling in a slot that we don't have, but as it stands, this would just be composited with one of the others. I'm not at all against that, but if the character isn't pictured or named, I tend to personally discount them. Up to you in the end, though
Regarding Múmia, I can't comment due to the previous issue with the link. So, a cousin from 2000 BC... they really don't want to tie Mim to a specific time period, do they? At this point, I think it's genuinely worth questioning what Mim means by 'cousin' - like, she might just use the term very liberally, and not necessarily mean the same generation. An alternate possibility would be that there's just a real longevity in their lives, but that might make it very difficult to place them in the tree. For example, how about Mad Maddy? I'm not overly familiar with her, but I can't see her being born about 2000 years ago. It's a complicated one - there's no easy way to solve it.
Resident autistic, diabetic duck fan.
I love hearing about bizarre/obscure Disney works - recommendations welcome!
Very interesting regarding Otmar - Gilles Maurice marked him as having been in D 3776. D 3776 was only published once in German that's been recorded - and it never appeared with I TL 921-A. My guess is that it might have originated from a typo - D 3776 appeared in Micky Maus 1977-22, while I TL 921-A appeared in Micky Maus 1977-02. Given the difficulty I had with the German forum and the mistakes I made in interpreting the posts there, I could see something similar having happened in this case
As it stands, the scans don't load for me - the link just leads back to this post.
As for D 9074, I'd say it's up to you how you want to handle it We currently have all of Scrooge's great-grandfather slots filled. Honestly, my stance would typically be to ignore these kinds of mentions - it's one thing if it's filling in a slot that we don't have, but as it stands, this would just be composited with one of the others. I'm not at all against that, but if the character isn't pictured or named, I tend to personally discount them. Up to you in the end, though
Regarding Múmia, I can't comment due to the previous issue with the link. So, a cousin from 2000 BC... they really don't want to tie Mim to a specific time period, do they? At this point, I think it's genuinely worth questioning what Mim means by 'cousin' - like, she might just use the term very liberally, and not necessarily mean the same generation. An alternate possibility would be that there's just a real longevity in their lives, but that might make it very difficult to place them in the tree. For example, how about Mad Maddy? I'm not overly familiar with her, but I can't see her being born about 2000 years ago. It's a complicated one - there's no easy way to solve it.
Here are the scans. Something had probably gone wrong when inserting the link.
As for Scrooge's great-grandfather, I thought of just merging it with one of the existing ones (by putting a reference to it on the merged character list on the website). It's nice to have a complete overview of these type of mentions, eventhough I admit that it's not a very important one; on the tree itself it does not really have any effect. The options are Joshua, Anatrone, Ebenezer McDuck and Oscar MacGoose. But based on context the g-grandfather needs to be Scottish, so either Joshua or Ebenezer are the most likely candidates.
As for Mim, I think cousin can maybe be interpreted as the "cousin of a direct ancestor". Since that are technically also cousins (e.g. a "first cousin 10 times removed", for a cousin that is 10 generation older then yourself and is the daughter/son of a g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-great-aunt/uncle). Thinking about this, such an interpretation could also be used for Mim's cousin Cleopatra, instead of having her as a first cousin of Mim. Though we still have no idea in which time Mim is supposed to have been born.
Very interesting regarding Otmar - Gilles Maurice marked him as having been in D 3776. D 3776 was only published once in German that's been recorded - and it never appeared with I TL 921-A. My guess is that it might have originated from a typo - D 3776 appeared in Micky Maus 1977-22, while I TL 921-A appeared in Micky Maus 1977-02. Given the difficulty I had with the German forum and the mistakes I made in interpreting the posts there, I could see something similar having happened in this case
As it stands, the scans don't load for me - the link just leads back to this post.
As for D 9074, I'd say it's up to you how you want to handle it We currently have all of Scrooge's great-grandfather slots filled. Honestly, my stance would typically be to ignore these kinds of mentions - it's one thing if it's filling in a slot that we don't have, but as it stands, this would just be composited with one of the others. I'm not at all against that, but if the character isn't pictured or named, I tend to personally discount them. Up to you in the end, though
Regarding Múmia, I can't comment due to the previous issue with the link. So, a cousin from 2000 BC... they really don't want to tie Mim to a specific time period, do they? At this point, I think it's genuinely worth questioning what Mim means by 'cousin' - like, she might just use the term very liberally, and not necessarily mean the same generation. An alternate possibility would be that there's just a real longevity in their lives, but that might make it very difficult to place them in the tree. For example, how about Mad Maddy? I'm not overly familiar with her, but I can't see her being born about 2000 years ago. It's a complicated one - there's no easy way to solve it.
Here are the scans. Something had probably gone wrong when inserting the link.
As for Scrooge's great-grandfather, I thought of just merging it with one of the existing ones (by putting a reference to it on the merged character list on the website). It's nice to have a complete overview of these type of mentions, eventhough I admit that it's not a very important one; on the tree itself it does not really have any effect. The options are Joshua, Anatrone, Ebenezer McDuck and Oscar MacGoose. But based on context the g-grandfather needs to be Scottish, so either Joshua or Ebenezer are the most likely candidates.
As for Mim, I think cousin can maybe be interpreted as the "cousin of a direct ancestor". Since that are technically also cousins (e.g. a "first cousin 10 times removed", for a cousin that is 10 generation older then yourself and is the daughter/son of a g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-great-aunt/uncle). Thinking about this, such an interpretation could also be used for Mim's cousin Cleopatra, instead of having her as a first cousin of Mim. Though we still have no idea in which time Mim is supposed to have been born.
Excellent, thank you!
That's a fair point - I'll run back and see what I'm missing and at them next update I'll double-check the stories, but to my hazy recollection, Scrooge didn't actually know much about Mr. Joshua. I suppose it could take place after the story, but off-hand, Ebenezer feels like a better fit.
That definitely makes sense! I've heard cousin used that way in a joking/non-serious manner, so I'd believe there are people who could use it seriously As for Mim, there's definitely some confusion. B 870072 has Mim and Magica having been friends since childhood. Seeing as Mim is from The Sword in the Stone, we know that she has been, at the very least, of an older appearance since Arthurian times. Understanding it from this perspective, we'd also have to conclude that Magica is at least that old as well. Her childhood is explored in D 2019-160, but I haven't read it myself - does that have any kind of specific time period? It would, logically, follow that Mim would be from the same time period. Either that, or we have a Grandma Duck situation, where there are two blatantly contradictory points that we'd have to pick a side on. We could, technically, ignore the film and assume another take on Mim, but there are at least two comics featuring Merlin as a wizard from the time period, which makes that harder for me to reconcile.
I know that, technically, we could refer to time travel, but it causes problems of its own; we could assume Mim as being from a more modern time, which would justify a fair few details, but then why did she stick around for so long in The Sword in the Stone? She had a longstanding rivalry with Merlin, and he's not implied to time travel unless necessary (Though that could be argued as being speculative, I suppose). It's a tough one, either way. I do think it would make sense to revise her position - the simplest would be to have her at some point in a medieval era, but that still leaves a lot of questions, especially regarding her family members.
Resident autistic, diabetic duck fan.
I love hearing about bizarre/obscure Disney works - recommendations welcome!
As for Mim, there's definitely some confusion. B 870072 has Mim and Magica having been friends since childhood. Seeing as Mim is from The Sword in the Stone, we know that she has been, at the very least, of an older appearance since Arthurian times. Understanding it from this perspective, we'd also have to conclude that Magica is at least that old as well. Her childhood is explored in D 2019-160, but I haven't read it myself - does that have any kind of specific time period? It would, logically, follow that Mim would be from the same time period. Either that, or we have a Grandma Duck situation, where there are two blatantly contradictory points that we'd have to pick a side on. We could, technically, ignore the film and assume another take on Mim, but there are at least two comics featuring Merlin as a wizard from the time period, which makes that harder for me to reconcile.
I know that, technically, we could refer to time travel, but it causes problems of its own; we could assume Mim as being from a more modern time, which would justify a fair few details, but then why did she stick around for so long in The Sword in the Stone? She had a longstanding rivalry with Merlin, and he's not implied to time travel unless necessary (Though that could be argued as being speculative, I suppose). It's a tough one, either way. I do think it would make sense to revise her position - the simplest would be to have her at some point in a medieval era, but that still leaves a lot of questions, especially regarding her family members.
No specific year is mentioned in D 2019-160 concerning Magica's childhood, however it doesn't look like the Arthurian times, more like the 19th or beginning 20th century.
B 870072 on the other hand, could easily have been much longer ago.
For Merlin we actually have prove of time travel in the comics. In H 2021-464, he travels to the 21st century to get a new pair of glasses.
Mad Maddy has, since she is from the descendants series, already problems on her own. I am not too familiar with the series, but since it has characters (and their children) coming from all kinds of periods (Beauty and the Beast, Mulan, Peter Pan, Aladdin, 101 Dalmatians, The Great Mouse Detective, Tarzan, Sleeping Beauty, Cinderella, Pinocchio, and so on) it's anyway very hard to say in which year that takes place. It's supposed to take place in a time after these movies have taken place, but for some reason everyone is still alive...
Though, the comics have the same problems of course, if you try to analyse it together. For example, how can it be that Jaq and Gus live at Grandma Duck's farm?
As for Mim, there's definitely some confusion. B 870072 has Mim and Magica having been friends since childhood. Seeing as Mim is from The Sword in the Stone, we know that she has been, at the very least, of an older appearance since Arthurian times. Understanding it from this perspective, we'd also have to conclude that Magica is at least that old as well. Her childhood is explored in D 2019-160, but I haven't read it myself - does that have any kind of specific time period? It would, logically, follow that Mim would be from the same time period. Either that, or we have a Grandma Duck situation, where there are two blatantly contradictory points that we'd have to pick a side on. We could, technically, ignore the film and assume another take on Mim, but there are at least two comics featuring Merlin as a wizard from the time period, which makes that harder for me to reconcile.
I know that, technically, we could refer to time travel, but it causes problems of its own; we could assume Mim as being from a more modern time, which would justify a fair few details, but then why did she stick around for so long in The Sword in the Stone? She had a longstanding rivalry with Merlin, and he's not implied to time travel unless necessary (Though that could be argued as being speculative, I suppose). It's a tough one, either way. I do think it would make sense to revise her position - the simplest would be to have her at some point in a medieval era, but that still leaves a lot of questions, especially regarding her family members.
No specific year is mentioned in D 2019-160 concerning Magica's childhood, however it doesn't look like the Arthurian times, more like the 19th or beginning 20th century.
B 870072 on the other hand, could easily have been much longer ago.
For Merlin we actually have prove of time travel in the comics. In H 2021-464, he travels to the 21st century to get a new pair of glasses.
Mad Maddy has, since she is from the descendants series, already problems on her own. I am not too familiar with the series, but since it has characters (and their children) coming from all kinds of periods (Beauty and the Beast, Mulan, Peter Pan, Aladdin, 101 Dalmatians, The Great Mouse Detective, Tarzan, Sleeping Beauty, Cinderella, Pinocchio, and so on) it's anyway very hard to say in which year that takes place. It's supposed to take place in a time after these movies have taken place, but for some reason everyone is still alive...
Though, the comics have the same problems of course, if you try to analyse it together. For example, how can it be that Jaq and Gus live at Grandma Duck's farm?
I was thinking that D 2019-160 didn't look like the right time period, but I have no access to the story so I didn't want to make assumptions - in this project I've learned that, oftentimes, every bit of info that you need will be on the first page you don't have
I also can't access B 870072, but going on what I have seen, it would track that that's supposedly set much further back. The only question is whether or not it actually works with what we know of Magica - I'm mainly just trying to determine when she could have been born. It does seem she has more ancestors in a recent time frame - which begs the question. Among the stories I ordered previously, there's also one featuring an ancestor of Magica who would have lived well after Arthurian times.
Oh, I agree - The fourth episode of I TL 1800-AP also has him time travelling. Though that one certainly felt more necessary than going for a new pair of glasses; I suppose he is more willing to do it than I had initially considered. Still, I suppose I'm somewhat against the notion of time travel being used unless it's explicitly stated; it could fill out some plot holes, but it's bound to become very confusing if we don't have a hard basis for it
I'm also not massively familiar with Descendants - I'll have to watch it soon and see if I can glean anything from it There's probably a hand-wavey explanation for the time periods; they're definitely intended to be specifically following on from the Disney versions (Not like, say, Once Upon A Time, where they're different characters) so hopefully there's some line of logic to it.
Yes, it's definitely a problem if we try to accept everything from the comics as 'canon' in the tree. Simply, I think we have to accept that it's outside of the scope of the tree - in the discussion regarding House of Mouse previously, a similar question was raised regarding time periods. It's not a perfect answer, but my idea is to take things as they come. Yes, it makes no sense for Jaq and Gus to live on Grandma's farm, just like it makes no sense for the Evil Queen to square off against Paperinika. Since none of those characters are on the tree, though, we can just handwave it away and ignore it. Were it to turn out that the Evil Queen or Jaq/Gus were related to someone on the tree, then we could go back and try to find some kind of reasoning or justification It's not a perfect answer, but I think for the purposes of the tree, it's the best one we've got.
Resident autistic, diabetic duck fan.
I love hearing about bizarre/obscure Disney works - recommendations welcome!
In Saving Donald Duck, Donald and Gyro travel back in time to find Donald's mysterious ancestor, Sir Donwyn de Duck, who lived in Bogwick, England, in 1203. This turns out to be a red herring, as Sir Donwyn is no one other than Donald himself. However, we learn of another ancestor at the end of the story, when Scrooge turns up with papers claiming he descends from the Roman emperor Dagobertus Duckius (Scroogus Duckus). At this point, Gyro destroys his time machine in anger.
In Saving Donald Duck, Donald and Gyro travel back in time to find Donald's mysterious ancestor, Sir Donwyn de Duck, who lived in Bogwick, England, in 1203. This turns out to be a red herring, as Sir Donwyn is no one other than Donald himself. However, we learn of another ancestor at the end of the story, when Scrooge turns up with papers claiming he descends from the Roman emperor Dagobertus Duckius (Scroogus Duckus). At this point, Gyro destroys his time machine in anger.
In which language/version is that? Because in the German copy that I read before, no name is mentioned for the Roman ancestor.
Some of my books arrived today, so I can confirm the following:
In I TL 3008-5, Scrooge gets a letter that is sealed with the 'symbol of the McPaperons'. When talking with Donald about it, Donald asks "So this would be your clan's crest?" and Scrooge responds with "Exactly! The legendary mark of the ancestors!". What's odd is that Scrooge mentions 'All of us McPaperons' - they are, of course, relatives, but odd way to phrase it. The letter contains a bit of fabric - more specifically, a tartan with 'the characteristic colours of our clan'. I can confirm that the Dutch version more-or-less matches the original; the relative in question is named Angus Okon McPaperon. Scrooge refers to him as 'an old and dear friend of mine... with whom I shared the most beautiful moments of my youth... but also the ugliest!' The McGooses are still seen as rivals - and, interestingly, the Italian version directly has them as the McGooses. The basic idea from the letter is that Angus needs Scrooge's help, and Scrooge is keeping a promise they made when they were younger. Angus also requests that Scrooge bring the Paperonicom, 'an ancient diary written by hand by an ancestor of ours'. It's said to carry accounts of the major events in the history of the Clan McPaperon. They all leave for Scotland, and Scrooge explains to Donald and the boys that "The descendants of the McPaperons live in the northern part of the country, in an area of moors and rugged mountains". They meet Angus, who has opened a factory - but Petronius McGoose threatens to get him shut down over a land dispute, and intends to build a castle like that of his ancestors where the factory currently stands. It's partially for his own business, but also because he holds a grudge against Scrooge and Angus from their younger days. Angus explains that, while the land has been owned by the McPaperons for centuries, it was once challenged by the McGooses - so a McPaperon and a McGoose fought over it in a joust (The blue/yellow one is the McPaperon). As it turns out, Petronius found a parchment confirming that the McGoose ancestor won, which is why he's entitled to the land. It turned out that the McGooses cheated, and the king, enraged, wrote up a document officially assigning the land to the McPaperons. That document, however, was lost, and Angus needs to find it before Petronius can shut down the factory. The two look through the Paperonicom while Donald and the boys take a tour of the area. While watching the locals, Donald recalls a story Scrooge told him about the titular Bagpipes of the McPaperons, which they played in times of grave danger, which were lost to the mists of time. A few hours later, the crew goes to visit the abandoned castle of the McPaperons to see if they can find the lost document. Petronius causes them to get trapped in there. They find the document, as well as the bagpipes, in a hidden room. By the end, Petronius has all but won, so Scrooge plays the bagpipes, and, in Angus words, it turns out to have the power to make all members of the clan appear immediately. Angus ends, noting his surprise that a McPaperon could play the bagpipes so badly. So, to confirm: Angus is indeed a relative, as are all of the characters that appear at the end. I would assume them to be ghosts, as they're all summoned in uniform (as is tradition) but it could be taken as living relatives, either. The McGooses are definitely not related.
Next is I PM 174-2. The story opens with Donald finding out that his great uncle Zenobius Paper leaving $100,000 to him and his cousins.
He says it will be divided between him, Gladstone and Fethry, but he's not sure, and decided to check. (He'd be very upset if he checked this tree ) A chimney sweep is walking by, and offers a lady a chimney sweep. She says that hers is fine, but explains that Donald is in desperate need of one.
He goes over, and offers to clean Donald's chimney for two dollars and a sandwich. When Donald leaves, he looks at Donald's album, noting that it must be nice to have a family. The page it's open to shows Zia Paper and Cugino Paperozzo - Paperozzo is obscured in the photo.
The chimney sweep plans to pretend to be Paperozzo - not aware of the money. He just wants to have a family. He ends up staying with Donald, explaining his backstory - he was at a shipyard, and lost his memory in an accident, so ended up working on the ship. In his head, he notes that that's actually what happened - he doesn't really know who he is. Donald tries to prove his lies many times, and always fails - and, eventually, Donald catches him out as the chimney sweep. However, in one last test, Donald reveals that one of their cousins would have a specific birthmark - which the sweep has.
So, of course, it turns out that the chimney sweep really is Paperozzo, even if he didn't know it!
Finally, I PM 103-A (Didn't include I PM 156-1 as that's about descendants) Scrooge is speaking with the head of 'The Club of the Rich and Noble', who tells him that being the richest person in the world isn't enough - he also needs to be able to boast noble origins. As such, Scrooge gets kicked out. Scrooge is upset, and Ludwig happens upon him. Scrooge explains his plight, and Ludwig tells him that he's an expert on many genealogies, including Finnish, Vikings, Trojans and Scots. He digs up plenty of evidence to help Scrooge. Scrooge gets Ludwig to do a presentation at the club showcasing this. He decides to do a presentation in Epic Poetry.
The story takes place in a small Finnish village in the year 850. It was besieged by vikings seeking revenge for a stolen fishing boat.
The story centres around the Finnish warrior, Paperinérik and his Three Unnamed Nephews.
It's a long story, so I'll only summarize the relevant bits. At one point, the four of them hide in a cave, which contains a hidden lair with loads of books. This is, of course, the home of Sibilla Magò. I put her in italics because she's not designated as an ancestor. Unlike the Gyro lookalike (Archiehood), she actually shares Mim's last name and is more likely to be a relative in that sense. Again, though, no confirmation.
She explains that she's been waiting for Paperinérik for centuries, and tells him of his destiny, before sending him on his way.
He follows her advice, and goes to meet Principessa Paperinia, the daughter of the Unnamed King. The scans here are mainly just to showcase them.
Long story short, Donald overcomes the rival Gasturno (Like Archiehood, absolutely no inference of relation) and marries Paperinia. We cut back to Ludwig, who explains that "Paperinia and Paperinerik's great-grandchildren were among the first to cross the ocean and come to Duckburg! And Scrooge McDuck is their last direct descendant, as these documents demonstrate!"
All goes well, but someone pipes up - a descendant of a person from whom Paperinérik purchased perfume. Basically, Paperinérik was unable to pay him, and gave him an IOU, so now he wants to collect with interest. What's odd here is that he says "And now that you've demonstrated that you're descended from Paperenea" - I genuinely have no idea what that's meant to mean. It doesn't seem like a mistake, as Paperinérik's name is visible in the same panel. It's unlikely to be the king's name, as the debt was Paperinérik's before marriage. Possibly Paperinérik's surname?
At any rate, that's all for now - if any further info or scans are needed, feel free to ask!
Last Edit: Oct 11, 2023 0:51:10 GMT by alquackskey
Resident autistic, diabetic duck fan.
I love hearing about bizarre/obscure Disney works - recommendations welcome!
Off-hand, does anyone have a list of ones where we'd need (or prefer) a Danish version of the story for clarity?
I'm looking into picking up some Danish books, and have a decent list built up - so I figured I'd see if there were any others that warranted picking up before purchasing. Shipping is a nightmare so I tend to buy in bulk
The current ones I have prepped are: D 95169 D 96172 I TL 1017-B (Not really needed but it's dirt cheap, so may as well) D 7384 D RYDAHL 13 D 92064 D 2290 D 88067 (Again, not entirely necessary - mainly personal curiosity. If money becomes an issue, this'd probably be the first to go )
The list isn't necessarily concrete - I can only afford so much, so if anyone's aware of any more pressing issues I should try to find, I could swap some out I haven't indexed the most recent version - will be sorting everything when the next version of the tree is out - so if there are any characters where we'd either need or really want the Danish version, I'd appreciate it being said so I can look for it and try to pick it up
Resident autistic, diabetic duck fan.
I love hearing about bizarre/obscure Disney works - recommendations welcome!
Off-hand, does anyone have a list of ones where we'd need (or prefer) a Danish version of the story for clarity?
I'm looking into picking up some Danish books, and have a decent list built up - so I figured I'd see if there were any others that warranted picking up before purchasing. Shipping is a nightmare so I tend to buy in bulk
The current ones I have prepped are: D 95169 D 96172 I TL 1017-B (Not really needed but it's dirt cheap, so may as well) D 7384 D RYDAHL 13 D 92064 D 2290 D 88067 (Again, not entirely necessary - mainly personal curiosity. If money becomes an issue, this'd probably be the first to go )
The list isn't necessarily concrete - I can only afford so much, so if anyone's aware of any more pressing issues I should try to find, I could swap some out I haven't indexed the most recent version - will be sorting everything when the next version of the tree is out - so if there are any characters where we'd either need or really want the Danish version, I'd appreciate it being said so I can look for it and try to pick it up
Some other D coded stories of which the Danish version might be worthwile:
D 1511. In the German version, Donald's great-aunt Gertrud is mentioned, but we have no information about other translations. D 4398. Donald's aunt Marga is mentioned in the German version, but no information about other translations. D 96333. Elvira's relative is either her great-aunt (American version), her grandmother (German version) or her great-grandmother (Swedish version).
Off-hand, does anyone have a list of ones where we'd need (or prefer) a Danish version of the story for clarity?
I'm looking into picking up some Danish books, and have a decent list built up - so I figured I'd see if there were any others that warranted picking up before purchasing. Shipping is a nightmare so I tend to buy in bulk
The current ones I have prepped are: D 95169 D 96172 I TL 1017-B (Not really needed but it's dirt cheap, so may as well) D 7384 D RYDAHL 13 D 92064 D 2290 D 88067 (Again, not entirely necessary - mainly personal curiosity. If money becomes an issue, this'd probably be the first to go )
The list isn't necessarily concrete - I can only afford so much, so if anyone's aware of any more pressing issues I should try to find, I could swap some out I haven't indexed the most recent version - will be sorting everything when the next version of the tree is out - so if there are any characters where we'd either need or really want the Danish version, I'd appreciate it being said so I can look for it and try to pick it up
Some other D coded stories of which the Danish version might be worthwile:
D 1511. In the German version, Donald's great-aunt Gertrud is mentioned, but we have no information about other translations. D 4398. Donald's aunt Marga is mentioned in the German version, but no information about other translations. D 96333. Elvira's relative is either her great-aunt (American version), her grandmother (German version) or her great-grandmother (Swedish version).
Excellent - while it has to be confirmed that everything is in stock, I'm down for the following: D 96172 I TL 1017-B D 7384 D RYDAHL 13 D 95169 D 1511 D 4398 D 92064 D 2290 D 96333
I decided to skip on D 88067. Much more expensive than the rest, and since it's only the one story I'd be interested in (One we already have at that), it was just expendable.
So I'll be able to update on all of these when they arrive
Resident autistic, diabetic duck fan.
I love hearing about bizarre/obscure Disney works - recommendations welcome!